N.C. panel to consider easing rules for home births

February 3rd, 2008

Kill Devil Hills

Plenty of old-timers on the Outer Banks were born safely at home, in the days when that was the only way. But now, women who want that option are thwarted by the lack of trained midwives serving the barrier islands.

With high rates of Caesarian sections and dissatisfaction with maternity care that can be expensive and sometimes impersonal, there is significant interest in giving women a choice on the Outer Banks. Women here have to go underground for a home birth or drive elsewhere to have a midwife-assisted delivery.

A state panel this year will be considering whether to allow certified professional midwives to attend births in the home. Certified nurse midwives can attend home births in North Carolina, but they must have a doctor backing them up, and there are none based on Outer Banks.

“The Business of Being Born,” a newly released documentary about birth in America produced by former talk show host Ricki Lake, was previewed at the Outer Banks Brewing Station last week, attracting about 75 people .

The film, – compared in importance by one reviewer to Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth,” about the problem of global warming – highlights the difference between a home birth with a trained midwife, and a hospital birth.

Proponents say home births allow a woman to labor and deliver naturally with dignity and support. Hospital births, they said , tend to be more impersonal with interventions that include drugs and surgery.

“Women should have a choice,” said Amanda Finchem, an organizer of the event. “They should have access to local midwifery care.”

North Carolina is one of 10 states where a certified professional midwife, who typically is trained through an apprenticeship and does not need a nursing degree, cannot practice legally. They have been legal in Virginia for the past two years.

“I feel that this is a serious mistake, given that our state consistently ranks poorly in terms of neonatal and infant mortality statistics,” Henry Dorn, a High Point OB-GYN and founder of North Carolina Physicians for Midwives, said in an October letter to colleagues. “Maternal health and access to maternity care are clearly significant contributors to this.”

In 2006, North Carolina’s C-section rate was 30.3 percent, according to the N.C. State Center for Health Statistics. The national rate was 31.1 percent, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

For about 10 years, the North Carolina Friends of Midwives has been lobbying the General Assembly to change the law, said Victoria Brown, founder and director of the group.

Now, a new study committee on midwives has been established by the North Carolina House of Representatives.

The Select Committee on Licensing Midwives will hold its first meeting on Feb. 13, said Karen Cochrane-Brown, the committee’s co-counsel.

The committee, which has been asked to study the need to license midwives to provide prenatal and postpartum care and attend labor and delivery, is expected to deliver a report by year’s end.

Caron Jones, a certified nurse-midwife from Pittsboro, was selected to serve on the committee. Jones is the former director of the Outer Banks’ only birthing center, which closed in 2003.

Today, there is no full-time midwife who serves the Outer Banks, said Ashley Davis, a certified nurse midwife at Northeastern OB-GYN in Elizabeth City. Davis also has a part-time office at Regional Medical Center in Kitty Hawk.

Davis can do everything an OB-GYN does, except perform surgery or attend to high-risk patients. She delivers babies at Albemarle Hospital, but technically she is not limited to a hospital.

“A home birth is legal in North Carolina, but you run into a problem in North Carolina because I have to have a physician back me up,” she said. “There’s not that many physicians who are willing to do that, I think because of the legal ramifications and also because of insurance.”

Although she has a very good working relationship with local physicians, Davis said, doctors and pregnant women need to learn more about the benefits of using a midwife .

“There’s a lot of women who want a midwife at their birth because they want that support,” she said.

Studies show that home births with a midwife cost about one-third of a hospital birth, and both the mother and the baby have fewer complications.

Brown said there are only three midwives in North Carolina who can do home births with the required doctor backup. But people in the state have home births anyway because they do not want the hospital experience, or their area lacks an OB-GYN or hospital.

“They have a right to have qualified care when they choose a home birth,” Brown said. “It’s also a reproductive right for a woman to be able to choose where she has her baby and whom she wants to attend it.”

Catherine Kozak, (252) 441-1711, cate.kozak@pilotonline.com

http://hamptonroads.com/2008/01/nc-panel-consider-easing-rules-home-births

CPM Legislative Study Committee Approved

December 18th, 2007

Greetings Dr. Henry and NCPFM, 

I am delighted to report that our Legislative Study Committee, charged with evaluating the need to license Certified Professional Midwives in North Carolina, has been approved. 

This is the most substantive step forward in advancing midwifery in North Carolina in many years. 

As of this writing, we do not yet have a schedule, but I anticipate the Committee will conduct a series of meetings and may tour the state in hearing testimony. Without question, having the North Carolina Physicians for Midwives engage this study is of tremendous importance.  As soon as the schedule is set, I will alert you. 

Yours Faithfully, 

Russ Fawcett

Legislative Chair, North Carolina Friends of Midwives  

A Note from Ina May Gaskin

December 6th, 2007

How good it is to know that there is a North Carolina Physicians for Midwives. This is just the kind of organization that can help to reverse the influence of the anti-midwife propaganda campaign that was carried out a century ago in the US. The physicians belonging to this organization are a true credit to their profession.

Ina May Gaskin, CPM

Author: Spiritual Midwifery and Ina May’s Guide to Childbirth


Ina May

Note from Daniel Edelstone, MD

December 5th, 2007

I like the website. I am a very strong supporter of midwifery care. I think Obstetrician OB care has gotten way to medicalized, to the detriment of patients. Too much fetal monitoring, too much fetal testing, too many lab tests, ultrasounds, too much “fetal intolerance to labor”, too much”non-reasurring FHR”, etc. If we were this fragile as a species, we should have become extinct 100,000 years ago. All of these tests carry high false positive rates, which scare the patients and waste resources. Frankly, in labor suites across the country, it feels like a war zone - with yet another emergency just waiting to happen.


Daniel I. Edelstone , M.D.

Noted Maternal-Fetal Medicine expert, Professor and Vice Chair of Education, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, author of numerous research articles and co-author of Best Practice in Labor Ward Mangement.

Faculty Profile

The Business of Being Born Comes to Charlotte, NC

October 26th, 2007

A sneak preview of The Business of Being Born, a film by Executive Producer Ricki Lake and award winning director Abby Epstein, is coming to Charlotte!

 

This documentary won rave reviews at this spring’s Tribeca Film Festival and has been made available for special screenings this fall. It will be released to a wider audience in early 2008. Please join us at this very special event! Each night will end with a panel of professionals and consumers. The panelists include a CNM, a CPM, a RN/midwife, a LM, a consumer of hospital and homebirth services, and Dr. Henry Dorn.

 

 

WHEN: Wednesday November 14th, 2007. Reception at 6:30 P.M. Film begins at 7:00. Panel Discussion to follow.

 

WHERE: Ballantyne Village Theater. 14815 John J. Delaney Dr. Charlotte, NC 28277

 

TICKETS: $10.00 http://bbbcharlotte.eventbrite.com

Proceeds will benefit North Carolina Friends of Midwives.

Seating is very limited and tickets may not be available at the door, so order now! Due to limited seating, only babes in arms are recommended. All sales are final.

 

There will also be a showing at UNC-Charlotte for students and the public on Thursday, November 15, 2007.

Reception at 6:30 P.M. Film begins at 7:00 and will be followed by a Q & A session. Donations will be accepted for North Carolina Friends of Midwives (to be used towards NC midwifery legislation efforts).
For more information about the film, visit www.thebusinessofbeingborn.com

 

The show at Ballantyne Village theater is SOLD OUT.

A Note From Henci Goer

October 25th, 2007

Dear Henry,

I am delighted to endorse North Carolina Physicians for Midwives. Optimal outcomes for mothers and babies will be achieved only when midwives and physicians work together in an environment in which midwives can consult, collaborate, and, when necessary, transfer care in an efficient and timely manner to physicians. Optimal maternity outcomes also depend on physicians acquiring the skills and knowledge that promote normal birth and successful breastfeeding from midwives. I congratulate your organization for promoting that goal.  

– Henci Goer 

“You are not required to complete the work, nor are you free to cease from it.” — Pirke Avot 3:18

A Message From Marsden Wagner to NCPFM

September 27th, 2007

I am delighted to learn of the North Carolina Physicians for Midwives.  We physicians take an oath to serve the health of the people and this, of course, includes childbirth and the right of the family to choose the kind of birth which is right for them.  Midwifery is one option which should be available to all families as is the option of choosing where the birth will take place, be it in a hospital, birth center or their home.  Excellent research has proven midwives to be as safe as physicians to attend low risk births and further excellent research has proven planned home birth to be as safe as hospital birth for low risk pregnant women. The families of North Carolina also have these rights and your organization can work to guarantee these rights for your families. 

Sincerely, 

Marsden Wagner M.D., M.S.   

A Note from Jennifer Block

September 27th, 2007

As I discovered in my research, there is what I call a “scattered minority” of obstetricians who quietly support women’s access to midwifery-led care and out-of-hospital birth, and who are dismayed that the obstetric leadership oppose their efforts. It’s wonderful to see these practitioners standing up for women’s choice.

All best,

Jennifer

http://pushedbirth.com/

Jennifer is the author of Pushed: The Painful Truth About Childbirth and Modern Maternity Care

The Plan (July 26, 2007)

September 26th, 2007

Friends,

Let me summarize the events of yesterday…

I had a joint meeting scheduled with Rep. Ty Harrell and Rep. Charles Thomas at 11. I went early in hopes of meeting with Sen. Soles (hoping to urge his support and perhaps eventually influence Sen. Purcell). Anyway, I could not see him early and went to see Lara, Ty Harrell’s Legislative Assistant (LA). So, Lara tried to confirm that Thomas was planning to meet with Ty and myself and it turns out he had a committee meeting conflict and would be unavailable.

So…I got on Sen. Soles’ calendar at 2:15 and Lara suggested Ty go with me. In the mean time, I thought I would drop in on Sen. Stan Bingham who has supported the effort with Patty these past years (Co-Chair of the Health Committee). Anyway, he got out early from a meeting and invested a good half hour with me discussing his views of the environment and the history.

His view is that the NC General Assembly will want to defer to the Medical Society (this certainly makes sense) and will be very reluctant to proceed if they oppose. This is also reflected in his relationship with Purcell (whom he respects and has a good relationship with). I discussed how there are no examples in the US in which the state’s Medical Society has supported this and that we need an alternate plan, he could not embrace going around them. We both agreed that we don’t know how to solve that problem.

Anyway, he remains a great supporter of ours, and I am thankful for his long standing support.

So I had some time to kill and decided to head over to the other building and talk to some people. I decided to discuss with Rep. Thomas Wright (my Representative and former Chair of the Health Committee) who I have met with several times in the past and has been very responsive. He was supposed to be in meetings, but I saw him in the hall and decided to invest a few minutes chatting with his LA. He returns to his office, recognizes me, and invites me into his office for a nice long discussion.

This was not part of the plan, but here is where we make progress. I would rather be lucky than smart any day.

I said to him that we need a plan to pass our midwifery legislation and go around the Medical Society. He has suggested to me in the past that a study bill is a good path, but I haven’t been very keen on the idea without understanding how to use it. The study bill commissions a legislative study to be conducted between sessions. So, Rep. Wright told me we have two options: 1) lobby hard so that the General Assembly will override the Medical Society, but be warned that every legislator has 50 physicians in their district who will be called to action if there is strong opposition, or 2) have our study approved that results in a report and recommended statute elements.

His message to me was that studies that conclude in a report and a recommendation for language are generally successful and that this is a fundamental legislative tool for working through issues that are polarized particularly if there is a mismatch in political leverage. There are three advantages to pursuing a study bill now:

1) We can still get a study approved for 2007.

2) It gets us access to the 2008 calendar

3) It neutralizes the Medical Society if they are represented

The strategy is to comprise the committee as follows:

1) Four legislators (two from the House and Two from the Senate)

2) Two Medical Society reps (their choosing)

3) A Nurse Midwife

4) A representative from academia

5) A lawyer

His experience is that even if the participants from the Medical Society object, as long as the majority can come to conclusion based on sensible argumentation that it neutralizes the opposition.

So, I discussed with Rep. Ty Harrell after this and he is on it!!! Our objective is to add our study to the study bill that is the last thing processed during the session. If successful, we then need to execute on this study between now and the end of the year (hopefully meeting twice a month). It is critical that it concludes with a deliverable (a report and proposed language). This is the thing that addresses opposition - because they participated on it. The legislators will generally rely on the conclusions of the report. If the Medical Society further objects, the legislators simply say “but wait a minute, you were on this study”. I now understand how this can be very effective.

Friends - we have a plan. Keep your fingers crossed.

Russ

More Argumentation Favoring CPM Licensure (September 10, 2007)

September 15th, 2007

Greetings Friends,

Some time ago, it was mentioned on BirthPolicy how increasing access
to home birth midwives (i.e. CPM Licensure) could be of great benefit
in case of a significant emergency when hospitals are perhaps full,
non-operational, or unsafe for the birthing mother. Also, the White
Ribbon Alliance commissioned a study after Hurricane Katrina
resulting in a number of recommendations (I loaded the report to the
files section).

I had intended to make this case to the NC Emergency Management
agency, but never got a “round to it” ( a “round to it” is a large,
heavy rounded device for cudgeling people like me who ain’t getting
their stuff done). Anyway, I was reminded of this today and sent a
note (below), along with the report, to the Director of the NC
Emergency Management agency in hopes of support. We’ll see if he
takes notice.

Russ

Greetings Director Hoell,

My name is Russ Fawcett and I serve on the Legislative Steering
Committee for the North Carolina Friends of Midwives (NCFOM) which is
the consumer organization in support of increased access to midwifery
care in North Carolina.

I am writing to you today to urge your support for upcoming
legislation to license Certified Professional Midwives (CPM) in north
Carolina. CPMs are the national standard for Direct Entry Midwives
and provide prenatal care, attend labor and delivery as well as
postpartum care in out of hospital settings (primarily the home).
The CPM is licensed in 24 states and North Carolina is one of only 10
states that would prohibit their practice even though the community
of CPMs are the principal care providers that serve the hundreds of
planned home births that occur every year in North Carolina. Our
objective is to license CPMs in North Carolina.

So, how is this issue related to Emergency Management? It is very
simple. There are a number of scenarios that result in hospitals
being unable to support birthing women (e.g. hurricane, flu epidemic,
etc…). The CPM is THE ONLY maternity care professional explicitly
trained in home birth maternity care. They are certified in neonatal
resuscitation, can manage postpartum hemorrhage and emulate a mobile
primary care facility providing maternity care. As a state that is
subject to hurricanes (I have had the eye of 5 hurricanes travel over
my house since 1994) we should learn the lessons from the aftermath
of Katrina. I have attached a recent report prepared by the National
Working Group for Women and Infant Needs in Emergencies, a group
commissioned by the White Ribbon Alliance.

Clearly, integrating CPMs, the recognized experts in out of hospital
maternity care, into the health care system could be a tremendous
resource in the event of an emergency. They should be coordinated
with local EMS services as well as EMTs are not experienced in
managing labor and delivery should there be an unplanned birth
event. Furthermore, licensing CPMs and improving access to midwifery
care is a sensible step toward filling the gap in access to maternity
care in North Carolina (over 20 counties have no maternity care
providers and another 11 have only 1).

There are many other arguments supporting licensure of CPMs in North
Carolina and these are simply those related to Emergency Management.
I truly hope you will consider endorsing the effort and provide a
letter to NCFOM.

I would be delighted to discuss with you further if you have any
questions.

Best Regards,

Russ Fawcett
Legislative Steering Committee,
North Carolina Friends of Midwives
505 Rooks Rd.
Atkinson, NC 28421
spigget@aol.com <mailto:spigget@aol.com>
910-471-5187